Editorial


S:I.M.O.N. is an e-journal of the Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies (VWI). It appears twice a year in English and German language. S:I.M.O.N. aims at both a transnational and comparative history of the Holocaust and Jewish Studies in Central and Eastern Europe within the broader contexts of the European history of the 20th and 21st century, including its prehistory, consequences and legacies as well as the history of memory.

S:I.M.O.N. serves as a forum for discussion of various methodological approaches. The journal especially wishes to strengthen the exchange between researchers from different scientific communities and to integrate both the Jewish history and the history of the Holocaust into the different “national” narratives. It also lays a special emphasis on memory studies and the analysis of politics of memory.  S:I.M.O.N. uses a double-blind review system, which means that both the reviewer’s and the author’s identities are concealed from each other hroughout the review process.

Shoah: The journal deals with the history of the Shoah from multidisciplinary, transnational and comparative perspectives. It seeks to integrate studies on Jews as well as on other groups of victims of the Holocaust, especially on Roma, and of so far less researched regions of (East) Central and (South) Eastern Europe.

Intervention. The journal reports on research projects and their transmission into public events. It also informs about current educational and remembrance programs.

Methods. The journal serves as a forum for the discussion of methodological approaches as, for instance, the everyday history, oral history, gender history, the history of violence, anti-Semitism and racism and the theory of memory and memory politics.

DocumentatiON. The journal contributes to critical approaches on using and interpreting archival materials in the 21st century. 

Download the current issue S:I.M.O.N. 2017/2.

Articles

Download PDFThis article outlines the principal directions of my research: It focuses on the interplay of antisemitism and fascism in the ideology of the legionary movement in inter-war Romania as well as on the virtual consensus on antisemitism that was established in the 1930s as a result of the support for the movement received from most of the representatives of the ‘new generation’ of Romanian intellectuals. This consensus was pivotal in desensitising the general population towards the plight of Romanian Jews and making it possible for the discriminatory measures to gradually escalate into outright policies of extermination. Thus my research demonstrates the responsibility held by the legionary movement even though they were not directly involved in the Romanian wartime Holocaust perpetrated by the Antonescu regime: The legionary movement nevertheless promoted an antisemitic discourse that was much more extreme than that of all its predecessors and contemporaries, advocating a radical exclusion with genocidal overtones. Moreover, while being as ideological and abstract as its Nazi counterpart, legionary antisemitism posited religion rather than race as the basis for the exclusion of the Jews in line with the ideology of a movement that presented itself as ‘spiritual’ and ‘Christian’. The legionary exclusion based on religion proved as violent and murderous as the one based on race, both before and during the movement‘s time in power. As such, the evidence from the Romanian case study can serve to nuance and even challenge existing interpretations that identify only racist antisemitism as genocidal.

SWL-Reader

Download PDF

During the first two decades following the Second World War, hundreds of thousands of migrants arrived in the United States of America from all parts of Europe, many of them having fled the Soviet occupation. Several hundred had been in service to Nazi Germany or other powers in league with the Third Reich before 1945: as state ministers, administrative officers of the German occupational forces, adjunct policemen or as guards at the concentration camps and extermination camps. In the late 1970s, the US Department of Justice established an Office for Special Investigations. It was their task to investigate alleged Nazi perpetrators, and, if applicable, to prosecute them for violation of the US immigration and naturalization laws. Their efforts resulted in the deportation from the United States of America of more than a hundred of these persons.

Peter Black recounted the story of this office from an insider's point of view. Beginning with an explanation of the problem of competence, he explained why it took so long for these cases to be initiated, and how it was possible that decades passed between the initiation of a deportation case and the actual deportation. He then went on to analyse a range of cases, described the required evidence and finally presented a discussion of selected individual cases.

Events

Download PDFDuring the clerical-fascist Slovak State, "Tóno" Brtko, a docile and poor carpenter, is offered the possibility to 'aryanise' the small Main Street sewing accessories shop of Rozália Lautmannová. Torn between his good-natured principles and his greedy wife Evelyna, he finally agrees to take over the shop by making the deaf and senile lady believe he is her nephew arriving to help her out. Yet he then discovers that the business is bankrupt, and Ms. Lautmannová is only relying on donations from the Jewish community. While letting his wife believe he is making money from the shop, he gradually becomes a supporter of the old lady. More and more, a cordial relationship between the two evolves. When the Slovak authorities finally decide to deport the Jewish population of the small town, Tóno, in a deep conflict with himself and his values, finally opts for hiding Ms. Lautmannová – a decision which turns into tragedy. Obchod na korze won the 'Oscar' for Best Foreign Language Film in 1966. The film was presented on the occasion of a VWI-Visuals presentation on 29 January 2015 in Vienna's Admiralkino.

Download PDFAm 16. April 1944 begannen die ungarischen Behörden, die bereits entrechteten Juden in Ghettos zu sperren. 437.000 Menschen wurden in 170 Ghettos zusammengepfercht, die Mehrheit wurde bis Juli 1944 nach Auschwitz deportiert und ermordet. Nach dem 15. Oktober 1944, nach der Machtübernahme der Pfeilkreuzler, wurden die Deportationen wieder aufgenommen: In den Monaten November und Dezember 1944 trieben ungarische und deutsche bewaffnete Einheiten 50.000 Zwangsarbeiter in Todesmärschen in das heutige Österreich. Die in Budapest verbliebenen Juden wurden in ein Ghetto gesperrt, Tausende erschossen. Die Überlebenden des Ghettos wurden im Jänner 1945, jene der Konzentrationslager im Mai 1945 von den Alliierten befreit.

„Nur eine Quelle …“ gedachte dieser Tragödie: Wissenschafterinnen und Wissenschafter erinnerten mit einer einzigen historischen Quelle an die Leiden der Opfer. Im Fokus standen ein Artikel, ein Objekt, ein Protokoll, ein Brief, ein Foto, eine Zeugenaussage und ein Interview. Die Vortragenden besprachen die Herkunft der Quelle sowie ihre Entstehung, wie und warum sie erhalten geblieben war, was sie uns heute erzählen kann. Welche Gesichtspunkte kann eine einzige Quelle aufwerfen? Wie kann man sie entschlüsseln, und wie wird sie Teil einer Gesamterzählung der ungarischen Shoah? Die Veranstaltung schloss mit einer kleinen Ad-hoc-Ausstellung der präsentierten Quellen und einer zweisprachigen Lesung aus Béla Zsolts Werk Neun Koffer.

  • Einleitung (Dieter Pohl)
  • Ein Artikel (Ferenc Laczó)
  • Ein Objekt (András Szécsényi)
  • Ein Protokoll (László Csősz - Regina Fritz)
  • Ein Brief (Istvan Pal Adam)
  • Eine Akkreditierung (Kinga Frojimovics)
  • Ein Foto (Zsolt K. Horváth)
  • Eine Zeugenaussage (Rita Horváth)
  • Ein Interview (Éva Kovács)

 

Durch den Abend führte Béla Rásky.